Impact of Normality Pressure on Acceptance of Mobile Phone Technology: A Case of Employees of SMEs

Impact of Normality Pressure on Acceptance of Mobile Phone Technology: A Case of Employees of SMEs

Renatus Michael Mushi
DOI: 10.4018/IJICTRAME.311413
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The role played by the use of technologies in improving business processes is vital. Taking SMEs, for example, mobile phone technology is used to perform multiple activities, especially in developing countries that are characterized by low ICT readiness. The effective uptake of any technology requires maximum acceptance amongst individuals. While various factors have been studied on how they relate and influence intentions and actual usage of mobile phones amongst employees of SMEs, there is a lack of research that focuses on the social influence in that context. This is a quantitative study performed using SEM involving 459 respondents. The study extends TAM with a subjective norm before testing a resulting theoretical model. The results show that subjective norm has a significant influence on both the perceived usefulness and behaviour intention. This paper also provides recommendations to the key stakeholders on the approaches to utilization of mobile phone technology in SMEs.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

It is unfair to neglect the contributions of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) to the Countries' economies worldwide (Hourali et al., 2008). SMEs appear in sectors such as tourism, mobile money centres, transport services, restaurants and other recreational centres (Venkatakrishnan, 2014). SMEs in Tanzania, for example, account for more than 90% of the enterprises while providing opportunities for employment acts income in various alternatives (Kilangi, 2012; Venkatakrishnan, 2014). From the Tanzanian perspective, SMEs contribute up to 27% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and employ more than 20% of the labour force (FSDT, 2017).

The employees working with enterprises, particularly SMEs, rely on technologies an important aid towards the improvement of the work processes in terms of efficiency and timely manner. Mobile phone technology is one of the main alternatives in the regions of developing countries when compared to desktop computers (Mushi, 2020). The main reason for its use is due to its features that make sees them being used to performing activities regardless of when and where the individuals are (Mushi et al., 2017). Mobile phone technology allows people to work at any possible time and place such as at weekends, overnights or on leave (Kilangi, 2012; Mushi, 2018). According to Venkatesh (2000), a technology is only successfully used if it has been accepted by the users in the first place. Various factors and their relationships contribute to the acceptance of technologies in various contexts. One of the factors that have been found to influence the acceptance of technologies in various contexts is normality pressure (Davis 1989). However, the unique features of usage of mobile phones by the employees of SMEs pose questions on whether normality pressure can be one of the factors influencing its usage in the context. It is vital, to identify the key factors and establish whether they directly or indirectly influence the intention and use of technology to provide necessary recommendations to the key stakeholders on how to fully utilise the functionalities and achieve the best out of the technology. The majority of African countries depend much on mobile phone technology as the main option to speed up service delivery within SMEs. As a result, the deliverables of this research are important for the businesses and economies not only in the African countries but also in the other contexts since more activities are keeping on shifting to the mobile services.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 12: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 11: 2 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 10: 2 Issues (2021)
Volume 9: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 8: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 7: 2 Issues (2018)
Volume 6: 2 Issues (2017)
Volume 5: 2 Issues (2016)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing