The Determinants of eWoM in Social Commerce: The Role of Perceived Value, Perceived Enjoyment, Trust, Risks, and Satisfaction

The Determinants of eWoM in Social Commerce: The Role of Perceived Value, Perceived Enjoyment, Trust, Risks, and Satisfaction

Kamel Rouibah, Nabeel Al-Qirim, Yujong Hwang, Sara Ghasem Pouri
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 28
DOI: 10.4018/JGIM.2021050104
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

The influence of eWoM use for s-commerce in the context of Arab region remains unexplored. To bridge this gap, this study develops a model for eWoM use for s-commerce post adoption. This model link three antecedents-factors (trust towards other people, trust of internet/Instagram, and perceived risks) to eWoM use for s-commerce through the mediation of perceived enjoyment, perceived value, and customer satisfaction. The model is validated with a large sample of 843 Instagram users using LISREL tool. Research findings revealed that propensity to trust, trust of internet, perceived risk, and perceived value affect use of eWoM through the indirect effect of perceived enjoyment and satisfaction, while perceived value has no direct effect on eWoM. Customer satisfaction was a predominant predictor of eWoM use. The model has relevant contributions and implications for both research and practice.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

From Social Network Tools to Social Commerce

While Online Social Network -OSN- tools adoption in socialization have received an extensive coverage in the literature (Chu & Sung, 2015; Olanrewaju et al., 2020), still their usage for social commerce (noted here as s-commerce) purpose in developing countries, especially in an Arab context is questionable and have received lesser attention from researchers despite its increasing rate (Shin, 2013; Mikalef et al., 2017; Mikalef et al., 2013; Cheng et al., 2019; Molinillo et al., 2020). Hence, more theoretical development is needed to describe the specific characteristic of s-commerce and the factors influencing consumers’ current adoption of s-commerce.

S-commerce is defined as the exchange-related activities that can be influenced by an individual’s Online Social Network (OSN) in computer-mediated social environments – where the activities correspond to need recognition, pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase stages. Taking advantage of user generated content and electronic word of mouth (eWoM), social interaction encourages sales and transactions by connecting people who have similar opinions but have no initial prior connection. S-commerce can come in three types: (i) using e-commerce website to build community (e.g. Airbnb), (ii) combining OSN tools and e-commerce activities (e.g. Instagram), and (ii) bring a third-party s-commerce platform (e.g. TripAdvisor). This classification includes the five categories proposed by Cheung & Thadani (2012): Online discussion forums, online consumer review sites, blogs, OSN tools, and online brand/ shopping. Regarding the mentioned types, this study focuses on OSN which is the fastest-growing driver of e-commerce referrals. It is driven by 3.5 billion social media users and 5.1 billion mobile users in 2019; 52% of marketers believe that s-commerce is one of the most important investment areas (Greenlight, 2020) and 87% of e-shoppers accepts that social media helps them in making shopping decision, and 40% of merchants use social media to generate sales (Global Digital Report, 2020). Moreover, it was observed that the adoption levels of s-commerce is limited despite that consumers are switching from e-commerce to s-commerce (Li & Ku, 2018), which gives a highlight about the importance of conducting more research (Salvatori & Marcantoni, 2015; Akman & Mishra, 2017; Shin, 2013; Mikalef et al., 2017; Abed, 2020; Cheng et al., 2019). In fact, s-commerce is still considered a novelty that is evolving. Indeed 36% of customers searching for information about products on OSN before purchasing, and the number of marketers who use them (e.g. Instagram) for business has grown from 53.2% to 73.2% over the last three years (Beaulac, 2020).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 32: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 31: 9 Issues (2023)
Volume 30: 12 Issues (2022)
Volume 29: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (1993)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing