Learning Performance of Teaching Practice of Friendly Senior Care Space Design

Learning Performance of Teaching Practice of Friendly Senior Care Space Design

Meng-Chieh Jeffrey Lee, Hsiao-Yu Chen, Yi-Ming Fang, Ling-Fang Wang, Chia-Yu Chen
Copyright: © 2020 |Pages: 13
DOI: 10.4018/IJOPCD.2020100103
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Taiwan is an aging society, but the appropriate designs must be considered in senior care spaces. Universal design knowledge has been addressed in universities, but students cannot imagine how age affects the needs of senior citizens physically and psychologically. The teaching practice in this study adopted a dyadic teaching method whereby students observed the needs of individuals in a nursing care center for elderly people. It also used cooperative learning methods for nursing students to discuss the needs of senior citizens and to help design students understand the lifestyles of senior citizens through the use of simulation devices. Through the feedback from the learning process, statistical analysis was used to assess the learning performance of students. The design studio used these two teaching methods, and the respective work was entered into an open design competition to verify whether teaching performance was successful. Approximately 70% of the works earned design awards. This provided a preliminary validation of the success of the respective teaching practice method.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

In Taiwan, the government is currently implementing its Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 in response to society aging. Educational institutions have cultivated nursing and senior care professionals, but relevant hardware fails to meet the demand of senior citizens, particularly in the size of interior spaces and care facilities, hindering care providers from using their expertise. The main reason for this is that designers of interior space and facilities acquired no relevant knowledge during education. In addition, they cannot empathize with the physical and psychological needs of senior citizens because of the age gap involved. Furthermore, in many Asian countries, including Taiwan, lectures are mostly conventionally teacher-centered. Students become passive recipients of knowledge (Gwee, 2008) and participate in courses less actively, resulting in a lack of problem-solving, analytical, and evaluative skills and of knowledge integration and application abilities. Now that Taiwan has an aging society; appropriate and necessary designs for age-friendly environments are required because of the deterioration in the physical and psychological functions of senior citizens. Students majoring in interior design are generally equipped with basic knowledge regarding universal design from lectures concerning ergonomics, spatial scale, and color psychology. Yet, their designs may not be appropriate because they cannot understand the physical and psychological needs of senior citizens, and they lack critical thinking and self-learning abilities. Therefore, the present study selected “age-friendly space design for senior care” as the research subject and expected to enhance students’ problem-identification and problem-solving skills and also to assist in laying a solid foundation for future lifelong self-learning.

In this innovative curriculum project sponsored by the Ministry of Education, the present research team applied problem-based learning (PBL) in students’ group discussion. Students of design, health, and information and distribution science were grouped together for cross-disciplinary discussion to stimulate creativity in designing a diverse and comprehensive intelligent caring space. Accordingly, based on preceding experiences, the present study adjusted conventional lectures and cultivated students’ affective skills through in-situ activities and cooperative learning and encouraged students to participate in practical activities. Instruction from teachers in various fields and peer interactions provided students with guidance, knowledge, and competence, thus attaining practical education. The present study selected care facilities as the learning field and presented the results of teaching practice research. Students from the interior design department were asked to use an aging simulation suit in the care facility and were grouped with students from the nursing department to participate in cooperative learning. Students from the nursing department proposed users’ needs regarding space and equipment from the demand side of nursing care, and they also engaged in situational exercises with the students dressed in aging simulation suits. The situational exercises were aimed at prompting students from the interior design department to develop designs accommodating the needs of senior citizens to effectively address and resolve the inadequacy of space and equipment in the care facility. Students from the two departments engaged in field operation by employing the operation method (“learning-by-doing”), experiencing senior citizens’ needs, and completing their design for the purpose of experimental teaching and improvement of the spatial design in long-term care facilities. Furthermore, students from different academic backgrounds effectively participated in discussion and learning regarding the observed problems through the cooperative learning method and proposed designs that fulfill the requirements of senior care facilities. By practically experiencing the needs of senior citizens, students developed their designs to enhance the applicability of the spatial design and to achieve the aims of experimental teaching. Eventually, learning effectiveness analysis was conducted, and feedback was provided based on students’ design results.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2022)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing