Developing Ethical Future Managers Embracing Sustainability: Case Study of Budapest Business School

Developing Ethical Future Managers Embracing Sustainability: Case Study of Budapest Business School

Gábor Andrási, Dorina Körtvési, Krisztina Szegedi
DOI: 10.4018/IJWLTT.300786
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

The paper describes and evaluates how a higher education institution (Budapest Business School - BBS), aspiring for AACSB accreditation, co-created innovative tools, based on the UN's Sustainable Development Goals and the principles of sustainable development. The paper has two interrelated objectives: to present what sort of innovative, web-based tools can be used to promote sustainable practices at higher education institutions, and to highlight how such practices support institutional development processes in the context of candidacy for AACSB accreditation. Based on the academic literature on ethics and sustainability education, the respective accreditation standards and internal sources (databases and feedback from participants of events using the educational tools), these innovative tools were found useful for higher education institutions aspiring for AACSB accreditation in ensuring that their governance, faculty, staff and students not only understand sustainability, but also have the capacity to act sustainably and promote sustainable practices.
Article Preview
Top

Background

The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) expects from its accredited institutions to align with its standards, which aim to ensure that the accredited higher education institution prepare learners for “meaningful professional, societal, and personal lives”. The guiding principles of the standards include ethics and integrity, and societal impact, among others. Concerning societal impact, the institution is expected to make a positive impact on society, as a “force for good in society”. With regard to ethics and integrity, the institution is expected to encourage and support “ethical behavior and integrity by students, faculty, administrators, and staff in all its activities”. Such a pervasive approach contains appropriate policies and procedures, academic programs and activities, and an intellectual contributions portfolio with a strong emphasis on ethical behavior and societal impact. The latter one, defined as “positive impact on the betterment of society”, is expected to be covered in the institutional strategic plan (Standard 1), curricula (Standard 4.3), portfolio of intellectual contributions (Standard 8.3), and internal and external initiatives (Standard 9.1). The institutions aspiring for obtaining or maintaining accredited status can choose a framework (such as of the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals or the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria) for describing their activities related to societal impact but should be specific in how such activities are measured and monitored, how their academic programs incorporate societal impact, and how their engagement with external stakeholders have societal impact. (AACSB 2020a, AACSB 2020b)

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 18: 2 Issues (2023)
Volume 17: 8 Issues (2022)
Volume 16: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2006)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing