An Empirical Assessment of the Relationship Between Information Intensity and IT Leaders' Role and Structural Power

An Empirical Assessment of the Relationship Between Information Intensity and IT Leaders' Role and Structural Power

Moyassar Zuhair Al-Taie, Mohamed Abdalla Nour, Aileen Cater-Steel
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 25
DOI: 10.4018/JGIM.294579
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Using the theoretical lens of the contingency approach to leadership, this study explores the relationship between the information intensity of the organization’s value chains and IT leaders’ role and structural power. Based on data obtained from a sample of 174 Australian IT senior executives, a multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) is used to empirically test for differences between the IT leader’s role and structural power in high and low information intensive organizations. Findings suggest that value chain information intensity significantly influences the importance of individual CIO roles as well as the combined operational (supply) and strategic (demand) groups of roles. However, the IT leaders’ structural power was found to be unrelated to the level of information intensity of the organization. Implications and future research directions are discussed.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The growing pervasiveness of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), over the past few decades, and their gradual but widespread assimilation and integration in the fabric of most organizations has made these organizations heavily dependent on these technologies not only for their daily business routines, but also for their competitive survival. Moreover, the continuous developments in these technologies, such as big data and pervasive analytics, context aware computing, smart machines and devices, cloud computing and the Internet of Things (IoT), have all rendered IT a strategic resource and competitive imperative for all but the smallest business organizations. Likewise, these continuing advancements in IT capabilities have engendered an increasing pressure on the IT/IS function to deliver more significant results, and a corresponding demand on the IT/IS leadership to translate IT investments into competitive advantage (Joia and Correia, 2018; Klee et al., 2021; Babin and Grant, 2019; Chen et al., 2010; Saldanha and Krishnan, 2011; Grant and Yeo, 2019; Strickland and Theodoulidis, 2019).

The contemporary executive IT/IS leader is the chief information officer (CIO) whose role, historically, has evolved in tandem with the remarkable evolution of information technology (IT) (Bouaynaya 2020, Ross and Feeny, 1999; Strickland and Theodoulidis, 2019), reflecting a seemingly symbiotic relationship between them. This continuous IT revolution and globalization have now been generally recognized in the literature as the underlying cause of the evolutionary change in the roles and responsibilities of the chief information officer (CIO) (Barens et al., 2021; Adams and Weiss 2011; Hodgson and Lane 2010; Weiss and Adams 2010). That evolution has, partially at least, led to a confusion in the nature of the role of the CIO, rendering it somewhat ambiguous and largely ill-defined (Gerth and Peppard 2016, 2020; Hunter 2010; Peppard et al., 2011; Peppard 2010). Consequently, numerous CIO roles have been suggested in the information systems (IS) research literature over the past few years (George and Howard 2020; Chen et al., 2010; Smaltz et al., 2006). Indeed, much of the contemporary IS research has largely focused on the evolving roles of the CIO and their personal attributes and competencies (Peppard, 2010; Peppard et al., 2011), with undue emphasis being placed on the individual per se, prompting some researchers to suggest that “perhaps research has been progressing down the wrong path” (Peppard, 2010, p.75). More research is thus needed to shift the focus and direct enquiry into the innumerable factors and contextual variables theorized to bear on the IT/IS function in general, and its executive leader (i.e. CIO) in particular. This is echoed by Ghawe and Gonzalez (2019) who called upon IS scholars to investigate more contextual factors that might influence the IT leaders’ behavior and effectiveness.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 32: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 31: 9 Issues (2023)
Volume 30: 12 Issues (2022)
Volume 29: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (1993)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing