An Automatic MR Brain Image Segmentation Method Using a Multitask Quadratic Regularized Clustering Algorithm

An Automatic MR Brain Image Segmentation Method Using a Multitask Quadratic Regularized Clustering Algorithm

Lei Hua, Jing Xue, Leyuan Zhou
DOI: 10.4018/IJHSTM.2021070104
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In the diagnosis of clinical medicine, medical image processing plays a vital role and has become a hot issue in image processing. Magnetic resonance imaging not only provides convenience for treatment, but also brings help to the rehabilitation of patients. However, there are some unfavorable factors in MRI brain images, such as blurred boundary data, weak anti-noise ability, and so on. The classical fuzzy clustering algorithm has strong advantages, but the improved method is relatively simple, only adjusting the degree of membership or changing the distance algorithm to enhance the clustering effect. Therefore, this paper proposes a new multitask quadratic regularized clustering (MT-QRC) algorithm for MRI brain image segmentation, which improves the single-task clustering performance by transferring relevant knowledge between tasks. The proposed MT-QRC algorithm introduces the spatial information item controlled by the quadratic regularization term to replace the fuzzy index, which reduces the limitation of the fuzzy index in clustering and enhances the parameter flexibility.
Article Preview
Top

2.1 Quadratic Regularization Clustering Algorithm

Among the fuzzy clustering algorithms, the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm is the most classical algorithm(Dubey, Y.K., & Mushrif, M.M.,2016). FCM algorithm adjusts the fuzzy factor IJHSTM.2021070104.m01, regards the nonlinear parameters IJHSTM.2021070104.m02 as the regularization of c-means, and iteratively updates the clustering center and membership matrix until the best clustering center is obtained. Different from FCM, quadratic regularization clustering algorithm takes maximum entropy clustering (MEC) as an example (Karayiannis, N.B.,1994; Li,R.,& Mukaidono,M.,1995) and quadratic function IJHSTM.2021070104.m03 as a new nonlinear term. Give a dataset IJHSTM.2021070104.m04 consist of IJHSTM.2021070104.m05 data, where IJHSTM.2021070104.m06 denotes the dimension of the data in the dataset, and IJHSTM.2021070104.m07 denotes the number of samples in the dataset. The number of clusters in the dataset can be expressed as IJHSTM.2021070104.m08. The quadratic regularization clustering algorithm can be expressed mathematically as the following functions:

IJHSTM.2021070104.m09
(1)
IJHSTM.2021070104.m10
where IJHSTM.2021070104.m11 represents the clustering centroid, IJHSTM.2021070104.m12 represents the membership matrix, IJHSTM.2021070104.m13 indicates that the sample point IJHSTM.2021070104.m14 belongs to the fuzzy membership value of theIJHSTM.2021070104.m15 clustering centroid, and IJHSTM.2021070104.m16 represents the regularization parameter.

By using Lagrange optimization and iteratively updating the objective function, it is easy to derive the updated clustering centroid equation as follows:

IJHSTM.2021070104.m17
(2)
IJHSTM.2021070104.m18
(3)

The formula (3) can be obtained from formula (1). Therefore:

IJHSTM.2021070104.m19

Each IJHSTM.2021070104.m20 is minimized by IJHSTM.2021070104.m21 individually:

IJHSTM.2021070104.m22
(4)

Suppose IJHSTM.2021070104.m23, IJHSTM.2021070104.m24 can be calculated by formula (4) to satisfy IJHSTM.2021070104.m25. Let:

IJHSTM.2021070104.m26
IJHSTM.2021070104.m27
when IJHSTM.2021070104.m28, let IJHSTM.2021070104.m29. According to this algorithm, the membership matrix IJHSTM.2021070104.m30 can be obtained.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 4: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 3: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2021)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing